On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:00:37AM -0500, Loic Prylli wrote:
quoted text
>
>
> On 1/14/2008 6:04 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> I thought so, but due to the way that things are initialised, mmconfig
>>> happens before conf1.  conf1 is known to be usable, but hasn't set
>>> raw_pci_ops at this point.  Confusing, and not ideal, but fixing this
>>> isn't in scope for 2.6.24.
>>> ...
>>>     
>>
>> *ahem*
>>
>> I don't think anything of what was discussed in this thread would be in 
>> scope for 2.6.24 (unless Linus wants to let the bunny that brings eggs 
>> release 2.6.24).
>>
>> cu
>> Adrian
>>   
>
>
> Why not put in 2.6.24 a simple fix for the last known remaining mmconfig 
> problems in 2.6.24?

Heh, no, because it is _way_ too late for such a patch that hasn't been
tested in any trees, sorry.

2.6.25 is the earliest I'll take such a fix, and if it's really as
simple as you say, I'll consider it for the -stable releases for .24 if
needed.

But so far, we have a zillion patches floating around, claiming
different things, some with signed-off-bys and others without, so for
now, I'll just stick with Arjan's patch in -mm and see if anyone
complains about those releases...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/