On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 05:25:13PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:A lot of those I look at seem to be not really bugs; also my impression is that they sometimes crop up randomly. e.g. you change something completely unrelated and suddenly you get a section warning somewhere else. I was told future gcc versions would remove that. Why do you want it? I sometimes do that for debugging "define static noinline" in specific files or similar because it's easier to make sense of oopses when functions not inlined. Not sure it would work as a global option though because if you do it globally then all the inlines in all .hs would be affected and that might lead to immense code bloat. -Andi --
| Fernando Luis | [PATCH] affinity is not defined in non-smp kernels - i386 (v2) |
| FUJITA Tomonori | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Tvrtko A. Ursulin | Out of tree module using LSM |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [9/58] x86_64: Always use builtin memcpy on gcc 4.3 |
git: | |
| Dmitry Kakurin | Re: [RFC] Convert builin-mailinfo.c to use The Better String Library. |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: several quick questions |
| Scott Chacon | [PATCH] add a 'pre-push' hook |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: Change set based shallow clone |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Paul Greidanus | Re: [Fwd: Open-Hardware] |
| Richard Daemon | Nfsen and php problems...? |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Steve Wise | pktgen question |
| James Bottomley | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
