* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> But as mentioned, it's totally untested and I don't have (or really 
> want to have) a cross-compiling environment. And I don't care *that* 
> much. I just want something we can all live with.
> 
> So does something like this work for people?

quoted text
>  arch/arm/Kconfig                 |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/Kconfig.instrumentation |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

i like this approach better, not the least because it affects only one 
architecture so late in the .24-rc cycle. Instrumentation bugs tend to 
be found with a few weeks/months of delays. (because historically 
instrumentation has been typically used by folks who cannot change their 
kernel easily to debug it, i.e. by extension they dont run bleeding edge 
kernels either.)

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/