Hi,

On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:47:22PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
quoted text
> sound good for me.
> a few question please.
> 
> > +	for (i=0; i<RLIM_NLIMITS; i++) {
> > +		if (rlim_names[i])
> > +			buffer += sprintf(buffer, "Rlim%s:\t", rlim_names[i]);
> > +		else
> > +			buffer += sprintf(buffer, "Rlim%d:\t", i);
> 
> this else is really necessary?

no. not with the current sources. maybe something like the following would
be better:

#if RLIM_NLIMITS != 15
#  error New RLIM_NLIMITS add mising entries to rlim_names[]
#endif

quoted text
> > +		if (rlim[i].rlim_cur != ~0)
> > +			buffer += sprintf(buffer, "%lu\t", rlim[i].rlim_cur);
> > +		else
> > +			buffer += sprintf(buffer, "-\t");
> > +		if (rlim[i].rlim_max != ~0)
> > +			buffer += sprintf(buffer, "%lu\n", rlim[i].rlim_max);
> > +		else
> > +			buffer += sprintf(buffer, "-\n");
> 
> Why do you don't use RLIM_INFINITY?

because I'm blind and didn't see it... ;-)

maybe it would also be better to output 'inf' instead of '-' in this case?

yours,
 - clifford

-- 
The number of the beast - vi vi vi.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/