Thanks Kumar/Morton/Kim I shall make a small paragraph which describes the TDM driver architecture and the interfaces it exposes. As far as 8315 TDM is concerned it is a non QE driver and quite different from this except for the functionality and external interface it exposes. Right now TDM is not a full-fledged bus driver which probably can be done may be very similar to SPI. Please give your suggestions on this. With Regards Poonam -----Original Message----- From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:01 AM To: Andrew Morton Cc: Phillips Kim; Aggrwal Poonam; sfr@canb.auug.org.au; rubini@vision.unipv.it; linux-ppcdev@ozlabs.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Barkowski Michael; Kalra Ashish; Cutler Richard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:I'm ok w/taking the arch/powerpc bits, but I"m a bit concerned about the driver itself. I'm wondering if we need a TDM framework in the kernel. I guess if Poonam could possibly describe how this driver is actually used that would be helpful. I see we have 8315 with a discrete TDM block and I'm guessing 82xx/85xx based CPM parts of some form of TDM as well. - k --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Woodhouse | [PATCH 1/3] firmware: allow firmware files to be built into kernel image |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21 |
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Rick Jones | Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
