On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:10 EST, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said:
quoted text
> Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in
> 24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd3865b884952bd93c339d48725c33 adding some warning
> printk's.  Would it be more productive to test against the full tree, or
> leaving out the one commit I already reverted?

<voice=Emily Litella> Nevermind... </voice> :)

The new commit won't apply with the other one reverted - it patches
security/selinux/netnode.c which was created by the problematic commit...