Re: [patch 0/8] Series to improve the x86 backtracing code

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Saturday, January 12, 2008 - 11:24 am

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

I heartily approve of this series.

Good jorb. Especially the fact that you also fixed x86-64, which has been 
a total disaster in this area.

			Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/8] Series to improve the x86 backtracing code, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Jan 11, 10:26 pm)
[patch 1/8] x86: Fix x86 32 bit FRAME_POINTER chasing code, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Jan 11, 10:28 pm)
[patch 2/8] x86: Add the capability to print fuzzy backtraces, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Jan 11, 10:29 pm)
[patch 4/8] x86: pull EBP calculation earlier into the bac ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Jan 11, 10:31 pm)
[patch 5/8] x86: Turn 64 bit x86 HANDLE_STACK into print_c ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Jan 11, 10:32 pm)
[patch 6/8] x86: Use the stack frames to get exact stack-t ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Jan 11, 10:32 pm)
[patch 7/8] x86: Add a simple backtrace test module, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Jan 11, 10:33 pm)
Re: [patch 0/8] Series to improve the x86 backtracing code, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jan 12, 11:24 am)