On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:45:57AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

quoted text
> btw this is my main objection to your patch; it intertwines the conf1 and mmconfig code even more.

> When (and I'm saying "when" not "if") systems arrive that only have MMCONFIG for some of the devices,

> we'll have to detangle this again, and I'm really not looking forward to that.

I think this will be OK.  We'll end up with three pci_ops, one for

mmconfig-only, one for mixed mmconfig-conf1 and one for conf1.  We could

do with that now actually -- the machines which will definitely go beserk

if you try to use mmconfig could have the conf1 ops on those busses.
Let's take Ivan's patch for now, and do that patch for 2.6.26.
--

Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine

"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this

operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such

a retrograde step."

--

unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/