[patch 8/8] x86: Add the "print code before the trapping instruction" feature to 64 bit

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <mingo@...>, <akpm@...>, <torvalds@...>, <tglx@...>, <hpa@...>
Date: Saturday, January 12, 2008 - 1:34 am

Subject: x86: Add the "print code before the trapping instruction" feature to 64 bit
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>

The 32 bit x86 tree has a very useful feature that prints the Code: line
for the code even before the trapping instrution (and the start of the
trapping instruction is then denoted with a <>). Unfortunately, the 64 bit
x86 tree does not yet have this feature, making diagnosing backtraces harder
than needed.

This patch adds this feature in the same was as the 32 bit tree has
(including the same kernel boot parameter), and including a bugfix
to make the code use probe_kernel_address() rarther than a buggy (deadlocking)
__get_user.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>

---
 Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    4 +--
 arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c          |   44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.24-rc7/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc7.orig/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. 
 			[SPARC64] tick
 			[X86-64] hpet,tsc
 
-	code_bytes	[IA32] How many bytes of object code to print in an
-			oops report.
+	code_bytes	[IA32/X86_64] How many bytes of object code to print
+			in an oops report.
 			Range: 0 - 8192
 			Default: 64
 
Index: linux-2.6.24-rc7/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc7.orig/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ asmlinkage void alignment_check(void);
 asmlinkage void machine_check(void);
 asmlinkage void spurious_interrupt_bug(void);
 
+static unsigned int code_bytes = 64;
+
 static inline void conditional_sti(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	if (regs->eflags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
@@ -459,12 +461,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_stack);
 void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	int i;
-	int in_kernel = !user_mode(regs);
 	unsigned long rsp;
 	const int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	struct task_struct *cur = cpu_pda(cpu)->pcurrent;
+	u8 *rip;
+	unsigned int code_prologue = code_bytes * 43 / 64;
+	unsigned int code_len = code_bytes;
 
 	rsp = regs->rsp;
+	rip = (u8 *) regs->rip - code_prologue;
 	printk("CPU %d ", cpu);
 	__show_regs(regs);
 	printk("Process %s (pid: %d, threadinfo %p, task %p)\n",
@@ -474,22 +479,28 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs
 	 * When in-kernel, we also print out the stack and code at the
 	 * time of the fault..
 	 */
-	if (in_kernel) {
+	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
+		unsigned char c;
 		printk("Stack: ");
 		_show_stack(NULL, regs, (unsigned long *)rsp, regs->rbp);
+		printk("\n");
 
-		printk("\nCode: ");
-		if (regs->rip < PAGE_OFFSET)
-			goto bad;
-
-		for (i=0; i<20; i++) {
-			unsigned char c;
-			if (__get_user(c, &((unsigned char*)regs->rip)[i])) {
-bad:
+		printk(KERN_EMERG "Code: ");
+		if (rip < (u8 *)PAGE_OFFSET || probe_kernel_address(rip, c)) {
+			/* try starting at RIP */
+			rip = (u8 *) regs->rip;
+			code_len = code_len - code_prologue + 1;
+		}
+		for (i = 0; i < code_len; i++, rip++) {
+			if (rip < (u8 *)PAGE_OFFSET ||
+					probe_kernel_address(rip, c)) {
 				printk(" Bad RIP value.");
 				break;
 			}
-			printk("%02x ", c);
+			if (rip == (u8 *)regs->rip)
+				printk("<%02x> ", c);
+			else
+				printk("%02x ", c);
 		}
 	}
 	printk("\n");
@@ -1187,3 +1198,14 @@ static int __init kstack_setup(char *s)
 	return 0;
 }
 early_param("kstack", kstack_setup);
+
+
+static int __init code_bytes_setup(char *s)
+{
+	code_bytes = simple_strtoul(s, NULL, 0);
+	if (code_bytes > 8192)
+		code_bytes = 8192;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("code_bytes=", code_bytes_setup);

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/8] Series to improve the x86 backtracing code, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Jan 12, 1:26 am)
Re: [patch 0/8] Series to improve the x86 backtracing code, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jan 12, 2:24 pm)
[patch 2/8] x86: Add the capability to print fuzzy backtraces, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Jan 12, 1:29 am)
[patch 8/8] x86: Add the "print code before the trapping ins..., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Jan 12, 1:34 am)
[patch 7/8] x86: Add a simple backtrace test module, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Jan 12, 1:33 am)
[patch 1/8] x86: Fix x86 32 bit FRAME_POINTER chasing code, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Jan 12, 1:28 am)