On Thursday 10 January 2008 12:26:07 Adrian Bunk wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:15:15PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > But your patch does:
> > > 
> > > +config PM_CPUINIT
> > > +       bool
> > > +       depends on PM
> > 
> > That is because arch/x86/power/cpu.c where this happens is currently
> > 
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PM)                += cpu.o
> > 
> > If it was changed to CONFIG_something else then yes that dependency
> > should be changed too.
> 
> 
> Then fix this first.

Rafael indicated he would do that, but it is really outside the scope
of my patch. I was just interested in fixing a linker warning.

quoted text
> 
> And the following other points you didn't bother to reply to also still 
> stand even after this fix:
> - already __cpuinit code will waste memory with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=y

Don't know what your point is. Anyways if you think there is a problem
somewhere please feel free to write patches.

quoted text
> - change shouldn't be x86 specific

CPU initialization is deeply architecture specific. I don't see much use
in generalizing that.

-Andi




--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/