On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:40:41AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:51:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > +++ b/fs/ufs/super.c
> > > @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ static void ufs_print_super_stuff(struct super_block *sb,
> > >  		printk(KERN_INFO"  cs_nffree(Num of free frags): %llu\n",
> > >  		       (unsigned long long)
> > >  		       fs64_to_cpu(sb, usb3->fs_un1.fs_u2.cs_nffree));
> > > +		printk(KERN_INFO"  fs_maxsymlinklen: %u\n",
> > > +		       usb3->fs_un2.fs_44.fs_maxsymlinklen);
> > 
> > I assume this needs conversion via fs32_to_cpu() before we print it.
> 
> Yes, it does.  I wish people would run sparse before submitting patches :P

sparse wouldn't have helped it in the current state.  The thing is, it
doesn't understand printf-style formats.  We probably ought to implement
that - would have a benefit of being able to get rid of gcc stupidity
in that area and actually define conversion specifiers of our own for
things like u64, dma_addr_t, etc. without having gcc scream at us...
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/