Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » January » 1

Re: IDE/ACPI related hibernation regression: Second attempt fails

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override. by David P. Reed on Tuesday, January 1, 2008 - 11:59 am. (46 messages)

Next thread: WARNING: do not add new typedefs - is that for real? by Boaz Harrosh on Tuesday, January 1, 2008 - 12:15 pm. (5 messages)
[view original message]
From: Mikko Vinni <mmvinni@...>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@...>
Cc: <htejun@...>, <rjw@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <shaohua.li@...>, <len.brown@...>, <bzolnier@...>, <linux-pm@...>
Subject: Re: IDE/ACPI related hibernation regression: Second attempt fails
Date: Tuesday, January 1, 2008 - 12:11 pm

Hi,


this doesn't look like the same problem, although I'm in no way an expert.


It is -rc6 (I had to change -rc6 to -rcx in Makefile to support the fallacy of not

having to compile everything from scratch, but had to make mrproper to get


This one?

00:10.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c4)

00: b9 10 29 52 05 00 90 02 c4 b0 01 01 00 20 00 00

10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

20: 81 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3c 10 24 00

30: 00 00 00 00 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 02 04

40: 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 00 30 00 20 c9 00 00 ba 3a

50: 02 00 00 89 55 50 0f 0a 01 31 31 00 01 31 31 00

60: 01 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00


Hopefully this AML code isn't too large to post here. Maybe I should try post

the bug to bugzilla, although that idea is a bit scary...


---

/*

 * Intel ACPI Component Architecture

 * AML Disassembler version 20061109

 *

 * Disassembly of DSDT.aml, Tue Jan  1 17:20:43 2008

 *

 *

 * Original Table Header:

 *     Signature        "DSDT"

 *     Length           0x0000628B (25227)

 *     Revision         0x01

 *     OEM ID           "ATI"

 *     OEM Table ID     "U1_M1535"

 *     OEM Revision     0x06040000 (100925440)

 *     Creator ID       "MSFT"

 *     Creator Revision 0x0100000D (16777229)

 */

DefinitionBlock ("DSDT.aml", "DSDT", 1, "ATI", "U1_M1535", 0x06040000)

{

    OperationRegion (DBG, SystemIO, 0x80, 0x01)

    Field (DBG, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)

    {

        P80H,   8

    }


    OperationRegion (PMIO, SystemIO, 0x8000, 0x...
[ message continues ]
Previous thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override. by David P. Reed on Tuesday, January 1, 2008 - 11:59 am. (46 messages)

Next thread: WARNING: do not add new typedefs - is that for real? by Boaz Harrosh on Tuesday, January 1, 2008 - 12:15 pm. (5 messages)