On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:26:23 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:Then I need a replacement equivalent for the ATA layer and all the other drivers using it to indicate stuff that *IS* experimental, or not yet known to be highly robust. Drivers are not the same as core code Ingo and the world driver writers live in is very different to the one you operate in as is clearly shown by this and by the _p discussion. Still NAK. As the alternative is CONFIG_ATA_EXPERIMENTAL, CONFIG_NET_EXPERIMENTAL, CONFIG_VIDEO_EXPERIMENTAL, ... all being added by developers We will also need experimental badly in future when the EU liability rules (and probably the US ones in a similar time scale) change so that liability applies to software, because then it will be very important to clearly label code that is experimental or development code as such. Alan --
| Ingo Molnar | [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Emmanuel Florac | RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6 |
| Con Kolivas | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
