login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
8
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
Date: Saturday, September 8, 2007 - 1:17 am
On the day of Friday 07 September 2007 Chuck Ebbert hast written:
quoted text
> On 09/06/2007 07:31 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> writes: > >> Some systems lock up without the noapic option. > > > > Please find patterns: cpu type, chipsets, mainboard vendors etc. > > This is the first one I've actually had in front of me: > > HP TX1000 notebook > Nvidia C51/MCP51 mobile chipset
Do you have a hpet? If not, have you tried using acpi_use_timer_override wi= th=20 apic? bye, =2D-=20 (=B0=3D =3D=B0) //\ Prakash Punnoor /\\ V_/ \_V
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Wed Sep 5, 7:30 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andi Kleen
, (Thu Sep 6, 7:31 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 15, 3:39 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sat Sep 15, 2:42 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Ingo Oeser
, (Sat Sep 15, 6:58 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 15, 7:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sat Sep 15, 8:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Dave Jones
, (Mon Sep 24, 5:32 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Phillip Susi
, (Thu Sep 27, 6:03 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Fri Sep 7, 3:34 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Prakash Punnoor
, (Sat Sep 8, 1:17 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Mon Sep 10, 3:12 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andi Kleen
, (Mon Sep 10, 3:44 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Sep 13, 12:38 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Tue Sep 25, 5:06 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Mon Sep 10, 7:33 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
david
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Parag Warudkar
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Heiko Carstens
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
David Miller
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
992 guests
online.
Online users
zurajan87hs
videography
sreejithc
Syndicate