On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 12:57 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

quoted text
> Actually, list_for_each_continue_rcu() needs to be removed in favor of
> your new list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu().  There are currently only
> two users as of 2.6.22.  One of them immediately does a list_entry(),
> and the other would convert easily as well.  So please let me know
> when this gets accepted!  ;-)

Heh, ok, I won't add the text to that macro if you want to remove it
anyway. I guess I'll add your paragraph and ... hmm. what do I do with
it? Who's responsible for list.h? Can I push this through John Linville
and Dave Miller so I can get the fix into his tree easily without
synchronisation?

johannes