* Thu, 6 Sep 2007 22:39:31 +0200

[]
quoted text
>> > His patch improves the build process.
>> 
>> I would like to know timing, btw. Size, especially shown 1%, doesn't
>> matter if link time increased dramatically. `Allyes' config, when i
>> had fast and rammish machine was terrible thing (last winter). If 32
>> cores/cpus is will of author, then i'm even more suspicious.
>
> For non-developers size and speed of the kernel matter much more than 
> compile time.

I'm talking about benefits for the process (developers, testers) and
the result (end users, dogs eating own food :).

quoted text
> When you go towards embedded systems with limited resources a 1% size 
> decrease would often be worth it even if it would (hypothetically) 
> increase the compile time by a factor of 10.

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   5159478 1005139  406784 6571401  644589 linux-2.6.23-rc4.org/vmlinux
   5131822  996090  401439 6529351  63a147 linux-2.6.23-rc4.gc/vmlinux

Are this numbers show embedded target? I think no. Also time factor of
*10* can be spent more productively reviewing actual code of parts, that
are going to be embedded, no?

[]
quoted text
>> > There's nothing that requires treatment.
>> 
>> [Help for] The developers/contributors of those drivers, no?
>>...
>
> They did everything right.
>
> You should better try to understand the problem first before behaving as 
> if you knew everything better than everyone else...

OK, thank you very much. Now, describe what problem you are talking
about, please. I see non.
____
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/