> Chris Friesen writes:
> > Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 04 September 2007 09:27:02 Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> >>>Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net> writes:
> >>>>US Copyright law. A copyright holder, regardless of what license he/she
> >>>>may have released the work under, can still revoke the license for a
> >>>>specific person or group of people. (There are some exceptions, but
> >>>> they do not apply to the situation that is being discussed)
> >
> > The OpenBSD policy page doesn't agree with you:
> >
> > "...That means that having granted a permission, the copyright holder
> > can not retroactively say that an individual or class of individuals
> > are no longer granted those permissions. Likewise should the copyright
> > holder decide to "go commercial" he can not revoke permissions already
> > granted for the use of the work as distributed, though he may impose
> > more restrictive permissions in his future distributions of that work."
> >
> >
http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
>
> By my reading, this is supported by 17 USC 203(a)(3):
>
> (3) Termination of the grant may be effected at any time during a
> period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five years
> from the date of execution of the grant; or, if the grant covers
> the right of publication of the work, the period begins at the
> end of thirty-five years from the date of publication of the
> work under the grant or at the end of forty years from the date
> of execution of the grant, whichever term ends earlier.
>
> (from
>
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000203----000-
>.html )
