On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Marco Berizzi wrote:Yes indeed but this is a different type of failure. Looks like a higher allocation failure in the networking code. Someone created objects that required an order 2 allocations that failed. Slub is restricted to order 0 and 1 allocs. Hmmmm. tcp_collapse? This is due to a network configuration that required an order 2 kmalloc block. Jumbo frames? -
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Miklos Vajna | [rfc] git submodules howto |
| Catalin Marinas | Re: [StGIT PATCH] Don't use patches/<branch>/current |
| Lars Hjemli | [ANNOUNCE] cgit 0.8 |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [RFC] introduce GIT_WORK_DIR environment variable |
| rezidue | Speed Problems |
| Chris | Prolific USB-Serial Controller |
| Richard Daemon | Nfsen and php problems...? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
| Steve Glendinning | [PATCH] SMSC LAN911x and LAN921x vendor driver |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Denys | r8169 crash |
