Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rob Landley <rob@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-doc@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <andi@...>, <vojtech@...>
Date: Sunday, September 30, 2007 - 4:35 pm

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:44:02PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:

What's the point of this file?


The architecture is not called AMD64 under Linux.


I don't think such details as the 46 bit number should be in an index file.

-Andi
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX, Rob Landley, (Fri Sep 28, 8:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX, Andi Kleen, (Sun Sep 30, 4:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX, Rob Landley, (Sun Sep 30, 9:28 pm)