Tejun Heo wrote:
quoted text > Mark Lord wrote:
>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Paolo Ornati wrote:
>>>> I have this problem only with XFS, and even with XFS it goes away
>>>> mounting with "nobarrier"...
>>> This last is an interesting datapoint.
>>>
>>> I wonder if libata has a generic problem with NCQ + FLUSH CACHE.
>> Yeah, that's pretty suspicious. Prior to issuing a FLUSH_CACHE op,
>> one must first drain all outstanding NCQ commands (and not issue new ones).
>>
>> I'm sure the code must *try* to do that, but perhaps there's a bug in
>> there?
>> Or just another drive bug?
>
> If there was such a bug, the aborted commands list should contain both
> FPDMA commands and FLUSH commands. I don't think command filtering
> itself is broken. Possibly another quirky firmware but it's strange
> that this is the only Seagate drive showing this problem.
Yeah, that's the strange bit.
Surely someone at SuSE must have a drive like that,
which they could set up with XFS and reproduce the same results?
??
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] blacklist NCQ on Seagate Barracuda ST380817AS , Mark Lord , (Sun Sep 30, 1:43 pm)