Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>, David Rees <drees76@...>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...>, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Björn Stei <B.Steinbrink@...>, <eranian@...>, <ak@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...>
Date: Monday, September 3, 2007 - 9:20 am

Adrian Bunk wrote:
[on whether to track missing features]

    or there is simply nobody else who takes the time to implement it


Helping to bring it into shape may be one of the easier pastimes of a
gateway person.  (Can be done after mindnumbing day job.)


Adding a feature is not just a matter of amount of work, it is also a
matter of motivation and inspiration.  So, even if it remains a one-off
project, at least that feature came into life.

But besides these remarks I have to agree with your view, overall.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =--= ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 7, 8:06 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Wed Aug 8, 10:20 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Mon Aug 27, 1:54 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 1:55 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Mon Aug 27, 6:55 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 7:07 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 5:12 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 10:34 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 1:05 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 2:30 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 4:21 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 3:46 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 4:26 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 4:13 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Wed Aug 29, 5:24 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Wed Aug 29, 9:21 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Thu Aug 30, 5:05 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 10:43 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Fri Aug 31, 12:21 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 12:35 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Fri Aug 31, 2:06 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 8:24 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 5:12 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Fri Aug 31, 9:00 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 9:36 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 6:19 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Sat Sep 1, 3:51 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 4:32 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 1, 4:46 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 20, 12:44 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Michal Piotrowski, (Thu Aug 23, 4:08 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Thu Aug 23, 5:22 pm)
Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Sun Aug 26, 8:45 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:42 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:38 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Aug 27, 8:35 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:02 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:26 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Natalie Protasevich, (Wed Aug 29, 3:42 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Natalie Protasevich, (Wed Aug 29, 7:59 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Stefan Richter, (Thu Aug 30, 11:24 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Stefan Richter, (Mon Sep 3, 9:20 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 1:02 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:35 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:11 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Wed Aug 8, 11:20 am)