Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...>
Cc: <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...>, <torvalds@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <mingo@...>, <lists4me@...>, <adaplas@...>, <hpa@...>, <lenb@...>, <dth@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <nfs@...>, <Trond.Myklebust@...>, <andrew@...>, <peter.kovar@...>
Date: Monday, September 3, 2007 - 8:51 am

> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:36:32 +0800 "Jeff Chua" <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:

2.6.21 was OK, and 2.6.23-rc2 needed a manual workaround?

That's a regression.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions, Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Sep 3, 6:10 am)
Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions, Jeff Chua, (Mon Sep 3, 8:36 am)
Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions, Andrew Morton, (Mon Sep 3, 8:51 am)
Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Sep 3, 9:08 am)
Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Sep 3, 6:48 am)
Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions, Andrew Morton, (Mon Sep 3, 8:46 am)
Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions, Michal Piotrowski, (Fri Sep 7, 6:52 pm)
Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions, Andrew Morton, (Mon Sep 3, 8:57 am)