Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Monday, September 3, 2007 - 5:29 am

On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 05:24:37PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:

"Contributing a cleanup" is what the Kernel Janitor Project
already offers.

But "Contributing an actual feature" is much harder:

You need a feature:
- with a realistic chance of being included and
- hard enough that the person suggesting it doesn't simply implement it
  himself instead of requesting it and
- easy enough that a newbie can implement it.

And the code should then be in a reasonable shape for being merged.

IMHO that's nearly impossible.

Realistically, offering a TODO item for a feature would require the one 
proposing it to do an amount of mentoring work that is not smaller than 
the amount of work he had to spend if implementing it himself.

This might be worth it if you know for sure the person you are mentoring 
stays active after completion of the feature - but this assumption is 
too often not true.


cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 7, 5:06 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Wed Aug 8, 7:20 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Wed Aug 8, 8:20 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 20, 9:44 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Michal Piotrowski, (Thu Aug 23, 1:08 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Thu Aug 23, 2:22 pm)
Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Sun Aug 26, 5:45 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 4:35 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 4:38 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 4:42 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Aug 27, 5:35 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 8:02 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 8:11 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 8:26 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 10:02 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Mon Aug 27, 10:54 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 10:55 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Mon Aug 27, 3:55 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 4:07 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 2:12 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 7:34 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 10:05 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 11:30 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 12:46 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 1:13 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 1:21 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 1:26 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Natalie Protasevich, (Wed Aug 29, 12:42 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Wed Aug 29, 2:24 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (wa ..., Natalie Protasevich, (Wed Aug 29, 4:59 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Wed Aug 29, 6:21 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Stefan Richter, (Thu Aug 30, 8:24 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Thu Aug 30, 2:05 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 7:43 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Fri Aug 31, 9:21 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 9:35 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Fri Aug 31, 11:06 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 5:24 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Fri Aug 31, 6:00 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 6:36 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 2:12 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 3:19 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Sat Sep 1, 12:51 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 1:32 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 1, 1:46 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Adrian Bunk, (Mon Sep 3, 5:29 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Stefan Richter, (Mon Sep 3, 6:20 am)