Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » September » 29

Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...>
Cc: <jblunck@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <viro@...>, <hch@...>, <tiwai@...>
Subject: Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
Date: Saturday, September 29, 2007 - 6:21 pm

Hi Andreas,

On Friday 28 September 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So why not name it path_walk_put_pair() then?

Rationale: "_both" is just counting, "_pair" 
	means they are related somehow.


Best regards

Ingo Oeser
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[patch 00/10] Use struct path in struct nameidata, , (Thu Sep 27, 10:12 am)
Re: [patch 00/10] Use struct path in struct nameidata, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Oct 9, 5:16 am)
[patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional, Andreas Gruenbacher, (Fri Sep 28, 4:43 pm)
Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional, Ingo Oeser, (Sat Sep 29, 6:21 pm)
Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional, Jan Blunck, (Sat Sep 29, 8:36 am)
Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional, Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Sep 29, 5:25 am)