Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Saturday, September 29, 2007 - 2:14 am

On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 02:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:


Linux version 2.6.23-rc4-mm1-dirty (root@dyad) (gcc version 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)) #27 Tue Sep 18 15:40:35 CEST 2007

...


mm_tester invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x40d0, order=2, oomkilladj=0
Call Trace:
611b3878:  [<6002dd28>] printk_ratelimit+0x15/0x17
611b3888:  [<60052ed4>] out_of_memory+0x80/0x100
611b38c8:  [<60054b0c>] __alloc_pages+0x1ed/0x280
611b3948:  [<6006c608>] allocate_slab+0x5b/0xb0
611b3968:  [<6006c705>] new_slab+0x7e/0x183
611b39a8:  [<6006cbae>] __slab_alloc+0xc9/0x14b
611b39b0:  [<6011f89f>] radix_tree_preload+0x70/0xbf
611b39b8:  [<600980f2>] do_mpage_readpage+0x3b3/0x472
611b39e0:  [<6011f89f>] radix_tree_preload+0x70/0xbf
611b39f8:  [<6006cc81>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x51/0x98
611b3a38:  [<6011f89f>] radix_tree_preload+0x70/0xbf
611b3a58:  [<6004f8e2>] add_to_page_cache+0x22/0xf7
611b3a98:  [<6004f9c6>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0xf/0x24
611b3ab8:  [<6009821e>] mpage_readpages+0x6d/0x109
611b3ac0:  [<600d59f0>] ext3_get_block+0x0/0xf2
611b3b08:  [<6005483d>] get_page_from_freelist+0x8d/0xc1
611b3b88:  [<600d6937>] ext3_readpages+0x18/0x1a
611b3b98:  [<60056f00>] read_pages+0x37/0x9b
611b3bd8:  [<60057064>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x100/0x157
611b3c48:  [<60057196>] do_page_cache_readahead+0x52/0x5f
611b3c78:  [<60050ab4>] filemap_fault+0x145/0x278
611b3ca8:  [<60022b61>] run_syscall_stub+0xd1/0xdd
611b3ce8:  [<6005eae3>] __do_fault+0x7e/0x3ca
611b3d68:  [<6005ee60>] do_linear_fault+0x31/0x33
611b3d88:  [<6005f149>] handle_mm_fault+0x14e/0x246
611b3da8:  [<60120a7b>] __up_read+0x73/0x7b
611b3de8:  [<60013177>] handle_page_fault+0x11f/0x23b
611b3e48:  [<60013419>] segv+0xac/0x297
611b3f28:  [<60013367>] segv_handler+0x68/0x6e
611b3f48:  [<600232ad>] get_skas_faultinfo+0x9c/0xa1
611b3f68:  [<60023853>] userspace+0x13a/0x19d
611b3fc8:  [<60010d58>] fork_handler+0x86/0x8d

Mem-info:
Normal per-cpu:
CPU    0: Hot: hi:   42, btch:   7 usd:   0   Cold: hi:   14, btch:   3 usd:   0
Active:11 inactive:9 dirty:0 writeback:1 unstable:0
 free:19533 slab:10587 mapped:0 pagetables:260 bounce:0
Normal free:78132kB min:4096kB low:5120kB high:6144kB active:44kB inactive:36kB present:129280kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0
Normal: 7503*4kB 5977*8kB 19*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 78132kB
Swap cache: add 1192822, delete 1192790, find 491441/626861, race 0+1
Free swap  = 455300kB
Total swap = 524280kB
Free swap:       455300kB
32768 pages of RAM
0 pages of HIGHMEM
1948 reserved pages
11 pages shared
32 pages swap cached
Out of memory: kill process 2647 (portmap) score 2233 or a child
Killed process 2647 (portmap)


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Sep 18, 8:36 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 28, 10:33 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 28, 11:20 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Sep 28, 11:41 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Sep 29, 2:14 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 1:50 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 1:55 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 2:01 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 2:10 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 2:38 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Oct 1, 2:52 pm)
SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 9:16 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 10:38 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 10:49 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Oct 4, 10:50 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 10:58 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Oct 4, 11:26 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 11:32 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 12:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 12:28 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Siddha, Suresh B, (Thu Oct 4, 12:46 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 1:48 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 1:55 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 1:58 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 2:02 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Oct 4, 2:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 2:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 2:11 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 2:11 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 2:47 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Thu Oct 4, 3:07 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Chinner, (Thu Oct 4, 3:23 pm)
RE: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Schwartz, (Thu Oct 4, 4:39 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 4:49 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Oct 4, 7:43 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Oct 4, 7:53 pm)
RE: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Schwartz, (Thu Oct 4, 9:18 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Jens Axboe, (Thu Oct 4, 11:48 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Oct 5, 2:19 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Jens Axboe, (Fri Oct 5, 2:28 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Andi Kleen, (Fri Oct 5, 4:12 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Oct 5, 4:56 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Jens Axboe, (Fri Oct 5, 5:37 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Jens Axboe, (Fri Oct 5, 5:39 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Oct 5, 12:27 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Oct 5, 12:31 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Oct 5, 12:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 5, 1:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB, David Miller, (Fri Oct 5, 2:31 pm)