> > Why 512 words ?
quoted text >
> Though I have queued Mark's patch to be applied, my gut feeling would
> lean towards a single DRQ block, rather than 512.
Why not just work from the old IDE code.
quoted text >
>
> >> ata_altstatus(ap);
> >> - ata_chk_status(ap);
> >> + ata_drain_fifo(ap, qc);
> >
> > ap->ops->cleanup();
> >
> > might be wiser
>
> If someone needs that, they can override the error handler with their
> own. No need for a new op.
PDC202xx needs
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation , Alan Cox , (Sat Sep 29, 2:28 am)