Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2.6.22.7

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>
Cc: Jonathan Campbell <jon@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, September 28, 2007 - 5:24 pm

Randy Dunlap wrote:

I'll offer this suggestion, knowing it may piss you off, given the 
difficulty of preserving whitespace on *many* mailers without using 
attachments, and given that attachments can be saved easily without 
prying them out of the message, why don't you (one person) switch to a 
capable mail agent, if only for patches, instead of trying to teach many 
people to jump through hoops to avoid whitespace issues?

Not criticizing, just seems easier for everybody for you to avoid 
teaching people things they don't find useful elsewhere, or getting 
discouraged and not bothering.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel 2...., Jonathan Campbell, (Mon Sep 24, 4:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kerne..., Bill Davidsen, (Fri Sep 28, 5:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kerne..., Jonathan Campbell, (Wed Sep 26, 2:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kerne..., Jonathan Campbell, (Wed Sep 26, 7:44 pm)