Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rob Landley <rob@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@...>, Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...>, Joe Perches <joe@...>, Dick Streefland <dick.streefland@...>, Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...>, Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>, Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@...>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...>, linux@horizon.com <linux@...>
Date: Friday, September 28, 2007 - 12:41 pm

On 9/28/07, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote:

Logic tells me that an unused static variable should never go into the
.o. If something tries to take its address, it's no longer unused.


Yeah, that's exactly what my e-mail was about. The macros
KPRINT_SUBSYSTEM and KPRINT_DRIVER are not defined on the command
line, but in each source file that wants this prefix, after the
variables with the same names have been declared in kprint.h. This is
intentional; they can be overridden with a define, otherwise, they'll
default to static-const string variables.

Vegard
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Thu Sep 27, 5:18 pm)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 8:11 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Rob Landley, (Fri Sep 28, 12:30 pm)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 12:41 pm)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Miguel Ojeda, (Fri Sep 28, 9:30 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 9:55 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Miguel Ojeda, (Fri Sep 28, 10:00 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Sep 28, 5:45 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 7:59 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Geert Uytterhoeven, (Fri Sep 28, 3:31 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 7:46 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Kyle Moffett, (Fri Sep 28, 3:44 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 7:49 am)