Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@...>, Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...>, Joe Perches <joe@...>, Rob Landley <rob@...>, Dick Streefland <dick.streefland@...>, Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...>, Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>, Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@...>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...>, linux@horizon.com <linux@...>
Date: Friday, September 28, 2007 - 8:11 am

On 9/27/07, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:

snip.


This changes to KPRINT_SUBSYSTEM and KPRINT_DRIVER. The KPRINT_ prefix
is to clearly say that this is something related to logging. The
reason we can't use KBUILD_MODNAME is that this is defined on the
command line. The declaration inside the header would thus be horribly
wrong. We can, however, use KBUILD_MODNAME as a default value for
KPRINT_DRIVER, like:
static const char *KPRINT_DRIVER = KBUILD_MODNAME;
which would pre-process to something like:
static const char *KPRINT_DRIVER = "bcm43xx";

This value can still be overridden using #define KPRINT_DRIVER "new
name". In this case, it is possible that the original KPRINT_DRIVER
symbol can cause an "unused variable"-warning. I guess this is fixable
with the gcc "unused" variable attribute.

Vegard
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Thu Sep 27, 5:18 pm)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 8:11 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Rob Landley, (Fri Sep 28, 12:30 pm)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 12:41 pm)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Miguel Ojeda, (Fri Sep 28, 9:30 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 9:55 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Miguel Ojeda, (Fri Sep 28, 10:00 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Jan Engelhardt, (Fri Sep 28, 5:45 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 7:59 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Geert Uytterhoeven, (Fri Sep 28, 3:31 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 7:46 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Kyle Moffett, (Fri Sep 28, 3:44 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API (take 2), Vegard Nossum, (Fri Sep 28, 7:49 am)