Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Friday, September 28, 2007 - 1:26 am

On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:17:30 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:


That check is already in checkpatch.  Problem is that hardly anyone
runs the thing.

I think we're ready to wire checkpatch up to a email robot which monitors
the mailing lists and sends people nastygrams.  I bet that'll be popular ;)

(I'd love it if it could detect wordwrapped and tab-expanded patches, too. 
You wouldn't _believe_...)
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, roel, (Thu Sep 27, 2:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Sep 28, 1:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Andrew Morton, (Fri Sep 28, 1:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Sep 28, 1:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Sep 28, 1:32 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Andy Whitcroft, (Fri Sep 28, 1:53 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Andrew Morton, (Fri Sep 28, 1:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Andy Whitcroft, (Fri Sep 28, 1:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Andrew Morton, (Fri Sep 28, 2:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Sep 28, 2:06 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Mark Gross, (Fri Sep 28, 10:31 am)
Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups, Sean, (Fri Sep 28, 2:15 pm)