Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » September » 27

Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@...>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2007 - 7:28 pm

On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 07:19:27PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:

How about a mount option?  That way people can test without a reboot:

mount -o remount,deprecated={yes,no} /sys

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file wi..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 27, 9:29 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Sep 27, 10:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 27, 10:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Jens Axboe, (Thu Sep 27, 10:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 27, 10:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Jens Axboe, (Thu Sep 27, 11:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 27, 11:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Theodore Tso, (Thu Sep 27, 11:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Jens Axboe, (Thu Sep 27, 7:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Andrew Morton, (Thu Sep 27, 1:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Greg KH, (Thu Sep 27, 1:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Theodore Tso, (Thu Sep 27, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Greg KH, (Thu Sep 27, 5:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Theodore Tso, (Thu Sep 27, 7:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Greg KH, (Thu Sep 27, 11:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Sep 27, 7:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Greg KH, (Thu Sep 27, 11:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Theodore Tso, (Thu Sep 27, 10:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Kyle Moffett, (Thu Sep 27, 6:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Greg KH, (Thu Sep 27, 7:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil..., Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Sep 27, 2:45 pm)