> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Hefty [mailto:sean.hefty@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 3:12 PM
> To: Kanevsky, Arkady; Sean Hefty; Steve Wise
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; rdreier@cisco.com;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
general@lists.openfabrics.org
> Subject: RE: [ofa-general] [PATCH v3] iw_cxgb3:
> Support"iwarp-only"interfacesto avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
>
> >What is the model on how client connects, say for iSCSI, when client
> >and server both support, iWARP and 10GbE or 1GbE, and would like to
> >setup "most" performant "connection" for ULP?
>
> For the "most" performance connection, the ULP would use IB,
> and all these problems go away. :)
>
> This proposal is for each iwarp interface to have its own IP
> address. Clients would need an iwarp usable address of the
> server and would connect using rdma_connect(). If that call
> (or rdma_resolve_addr/route) fails, the client could try
> connecting using sockets, aoi, or some other interface. I
> don't see that Steve's proposal changes anything from the
> client's perspective.
>
> - Sean
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
>
general@lists.openfabrics.org
>
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit
>
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>