Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2007 - 7:44 am

> > Its a change of a specific error return from the wrong error to the right

And our existing behaviour may well break correctly written
portable applications, and is incorrect as well.

Testing so far says it doesn't break anything, which is no suprise if you
apply about ten braincells to the case under consideration.

Alan
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large f ..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 27, 7:44 am)