login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
27
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2007 - 10:01 am
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:29:19 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
quoted text
> The early LFS work that Linux uses favours EFBIG in various places. > SuSv3 specifically uses EOVERFLOW for this as noted by Michael (Bug > 7253)
isn't this an ABI change? What's the gain for doing this ABI change? -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file wi...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Sep 27, 9:29 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Sep 27, 10:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Sep 27, 10:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Sep 27, 10:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Sep 27, 10:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Sep 27, 11:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Sep 27, 11:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Theodore Tso
, (Thu Sep 27, 11:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Sep 27, 7:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Sep 27, 1:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Greg KH
, (Thu Sep 27, 1:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Theodore Tso
, (Thu Sep 27, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Greg KH
, (Thu Sep 27, 5:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Theodore Tso
, (Thu Sep 27, 7:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Greg KH
, (Thu Sep 27, 11:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Sep 27, 7:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Greg KH
, (Thu Sep 27, 11:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Theodore Tso
, (Thu Sep 27, 10:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Kyle Moffett
, (Thu Sep 27, 6:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Greg KH
, (Thu Sep 27, 7:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large fil...
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Sep 27, 2:45 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Pierre Ossman
Re: [RFC][PATCH] cpuidle: avoid singing capacitors
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Greg KH
Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))
Rene Herman
2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jesper Krogh
Re: NIU - Sun Neptune 10g - Transmit timed out reset (2.6.24)
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Arjan van de Ven
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Radu Rendec
htb parallelism on multi-core platforms
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
873 guests
online.
Syndicate