On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:19:06 -0000, Shreyansh Jain said:Go look at the call sites for this function - I bet that most of them, if they check the return code at all, only check for zero or nonzero, because they only *care* about the case that returns zero. Since they already know they're not passing a NULL pointer, they don't worry about that case returning a 1. So there's only two realistic returns - either the module is live or it isn't.
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Adrian Bunk | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 26/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 1 (socket set... |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
