Re: [PATCH 3/3] UML - Correctly handle skb allocation failures

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <user-mode-linux-devel@...>, <caker@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 6:10 pm

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:46:13 -0400
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:


Unneeded initialisation?

Maybe not a good name for a global symbol ;)

I worry that the memory at "throwaway" can get thrown away...


...  while other code is still using it.  Are you sure we don't need
throwaway_lock here?


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/3] UML - Correctly handle skb allocation failures, Andrew Morton, (Wed Sep 26, 6:10 pm)