On 9/26/07, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> wrote:
quoted text > PS: There was a thought of providing a facility to run a handler at
> function entry even when just a kretprobe is used. Maybe we need to
> relook at that; it'd have been useful in this case.
That would be really useful. I was writing a tool to dump some
function profiling info through /proc. This would help save an extra
probe on each function's entry.
-
quoted text > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: KPROBES: Instrumenting a function's call site , Abhishek Sagar , (Wed Sep 26, 12:52 pm)