login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
26
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@...>
Cc: <jeff@...>, <matthew@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-scsi@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <fujita.tomonori@...>
Subject:
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 10:07 am
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 13:56 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500 > James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >> Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plans for > > > >> the future? I do not see any other examples of the host template > > > >> members getting modified. > > > > > > > > Goodness, Jeff, you haven't looked too hard. There's dozens of examples > > > > I've come across trawling the horrible unmaintained drivers. I'd love > > > > to see scsi_host_template become const, but it's not happening any time > > > > soon, and we can address this little piece when the time comes. > > > > > > Well, sure, the driver is the owner of that memory. > > > > > > We're talking about common code. > > > > > > If everybody agrees SHT is R/W in the core, Fujita-san's patch is fine. > > > > Well, I don't like mucking with the template either. > > > > This whole mess is generated basically because the zero default of the > > template should be treated as initiator. How about this, which makes > > that manifest? > > > > James > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c > > index adc9559..7e26440 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c > > @@ -342,7 +342,11 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize) > > shost->unchecked_isa_dma = sht->unchecked_isa_dma; > > shost->use_clustering = sht->use_clustering; > > shost->ordered_tag = sht->ordered_tag; > > - shost->active_mode = sht->supported_mode; > > + if (sht->supported_mode == MODE_UNKNOWN) > > + /* means we didn't set it ... default to INITIATOR */ > > + shost->active_mode = MODE_INITIATOR; > > + else > > + shost->active_mode = sht->supported_mode; > > > > if (sht->max_host_blocked) > > shost->max_host_blocked = sht->max_host_blocked; > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > > index 0088c4d..4965e9e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > > @@ -209,11 +209,13 @@ show_shost_mode(unsigned int mode, char *buf) > > static ssize_t show_shost_supported_mode(struct class_device *class_dev, char *buf) > > { > > struct Scsi_Host *shost = class_to_shost(class_dev); > > + unsigned int supported_mode = shost->hostt->supported_mode; > > > > - if (shost->hostt->supported_mode == MODE_UNKNOWN) > > - return snprintf(buf, 20, "unknown\n"); > > - else > > - return show_shost_mode(shost->hostt->supported_mode, buf); > > + if (supported_mode == MODE_UNKNOWN) > > + /* by default this should be initiator */ > > + supported_mode = MODE_INITIATOR; > > + > > + return show_shost_mode(shost->hostt->supported_mode, buf); > > should be: > > return show_shost_mode(supported_mode, buf);
Yes, sorry ... code in haste etc. James -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Sep 25, 9:00 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Sep 25, 9:28 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Sep 25, 9:42 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Sep 25, 10:12 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Sep 25, 10:37 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Sep 25, 10:52 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue Sep 25, 10:56 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Sep 25, 11:34 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Sep 25, 11:45 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Wed Sep 26, 12:56 am)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, James Bottomley
, (Wed Sep 26, 10:07 am)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Sep 25, 11:55 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, James Bottomley
, (Wed Sep 26, 12:01 am)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Wed Sep 26, 12:10 am)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Sep 25, 11:55 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue Sep 25, 11:38 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24
, David Miller
, (Tue Sep 25, 9:05 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Linus Torvalds
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Paul Jackson
Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
Linus Torvalds
Re: 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off after suspend-to-disk. Screen becomes g...
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Mark Lord
Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
811 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
Syndicate