> >>> The dot-dot entry in the root directory is interpreted to mean the 
quoted text
> >>> root directory itself. Thus, dot-dot cannot be used to access files 
> >>> outside the subtree rooted at the root directory.
> >>>       
> >
> > Which is behaviour chroot preserves properly.
> >   
> And yet it is the dot-dot entry which is used to access files outside 
> the root.

Read it again, and read all the words. Notably "the dot-dot entry *IN*
the root directory". When your current directory is above your root
directory you do not pass through that dot-dot entry.

quoted text
> Do you believe that when those words were first written, the hidden 
> conflict, namely that it permits dot-dot to access files outside the 
> subtree, was understood?  

Yes. You need to remember the notion of chroot for "security" is a very
new one, and not one that it was designed for. Which as I've said twice
now is why things like vserver and BSD jails have evolved.

Alan
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/