Erez Zadok wrote:
quoted text
> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
> ---
>  fs/unionfs/copyup.c |  102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/unionfs/copyup.c b/fs/unionfs/copyup.c
> index 23ac4c8..e3c5f15 100644
> --- a/fs/unionfs/copyup.c
> +++ b/fs/unionfs/copyup.c
> @@ -36,14 +36,14 @@ static int copyup_xattrs(struct dentry *old_lower_dentry,
>  
>  	/* query the actual size of the xattr list */
>  	list_size = vfs_listxattr(old_lower_dentry, NULL, 0);
> -	if (list_size <= 0) {
> +	if (unlikely(list_size <= 0)) {


I've been told several times that adding these is almost always bogus - either it
messes up the CPU branch prediction or the compiler/CPU just does a lot better at
finding the right way without these hints.

Adding them as a blanket seems rather strange. Have you got any numbers that this
really improves performance?

Auke
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/