Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 - 8:34 pm

Matthew Wilcox wrote:

Well, sure, the driver is the owner of that memory.

We're talking about common code.

If everybody agrees SHT is R/W in the core, Fujita-san's patch is fine.

	Jeff



-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, James Bottomley, (Tue Sep 25, 6:00 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, David Miller, (Tue Sep 25, 6:05 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Sep 25, 6:28 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, James Bottomley, (Tue Sep 25, 6:42 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Sep 25, 7:12 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Sep 25, 7:37 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Sep 25, 7:52 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Sep 25, 7:56 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Sep 25, 8:34 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Sep 25, 8:38 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, James Bottomley, (Tue Sep 25, 8:45 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Sep 25, 8:55 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Sep 25, 8:55 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, James Bottomley, (Tue Sep 25, 9:01 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Sep 25, 9:10 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Sep 25, 9:56 pm)
Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24, James Bottomley, (Wed Sep 26, 7:07 am)