FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
quoted text
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> index adc9559..694015d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,10 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize)
>  	shost->unchecked_isa_dma = sht->unchecked_isa_dma;
>  	shost->use_clustering = sht->use_clustering;
>  	shost->ordered_tag = sht->ordered_tag;
> +
> +	if (!sht->supported_mode)
> +		sht->supported_mode = MODE_INITIATOR;
> +
>  	shost->active_mode = sht->supported_mode;


I almost hesitate to speak up, after making the original suggestion, but:

Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plans for 
the future?  I do not see any other examples of the host template 
members getting modified.

Perhaps this value should instead be mirrored in scsi_host, like many 
others?

	Jeff


-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/