Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> writes:Well it is cosmetic in a user space visible way. Which means I don't have a clue which if any user space programs or scripts care if we change the behavior. I just looked in the git history and brnf_sysctl_call_tables has been that way since sysctl support was added to the bridge netfilter code. The only comment I can found about the addition is: 2003/12/24 19:32:34-08:00 bdschuym [BRIDGE]: Add 4 sysctl entries for bridge netfilter behavioral control: bridge-nf-call-arptables - pass or don't pass bridged ARP traffic to arptables' FORWARD chain. bridge-nf-call-iptables - pass or don't pass bridged IPv4 traffic to iptables' chains. bridge-nf-filter-vlan-tagged - pass or don't pass bridged vlan-tagged ARP/IP traffic to arptables/iptables. So since forcing the values to 0 or 1 doesn't seem hard to maintain I am uncomfortable with removing that check. Eric -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
