> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:05, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 11:58, Damien Wyart wrote:
> >>>>>>> No, I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP set,
> >>>>>>> because I do not have CONFIG_PM_SLEEP set,
> >>>>>>> because I do not want SUSPEND and/or HIBERNATION.
> >>>>>> Same answer from my side: I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP for the same
> >>>>>> reason (and this worked fine without them in rc7). I do not think
> >>>>>> these settings should have changed between rc7 and rc8.
> >>>> Well, we haven't changed much.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Also, another test I just did: on another computer, rc8 is fine
> >>>>> regarding ACPI power off, even if CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is not set. I can
> >>>>> provide config if needed.
> >>>> On the box that fails to power off, can you please test -rc8 with these two
> >>>> commits reverted:
> >>>>
> >>>> commit 5a50fe709d527f31169263e36601dd83446d5744
> >>>> ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states addendum
> >>>>
> >>>> commit f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2
> >>>> ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states.
> >>>>
> >>>> and see if it works?
> >>> If it does, please test the patch from this message
> >>>
> >>>
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119052978117735&w=4
> >>>
> >>> on top of vanilla 2.6.23-rc8.
> >> You will need one more patch on top of just mentioned one.
> >
> > Hm, why did you put acpi_target_sleep_state under CONFIG_SUSPEND?
> >
> > CONFIG_HIBERNATION needs acpi_target_sleep_state too.
> Agree, attaching updated patch.
