On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:28 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:Easy way to make it pretty bad: pin a nice 0 loop to CPU0, pin a nice 19 loop to CPU1, then start an unpinned make.. more Xorg bouncing back and forth I suppose. se.wait_max : 14.105683 se.wait_max : 316.943787 se.wait_max : 692.884324 se.wait_max : 38.165534 se.wait_max : 732.883492 se.wait_max : 127.059784 se.wait_max : 63.403549 se.wait_max : 372.933284 -Mike -
| Jeff Garzik | [PATCH 1/9] irq-remove: core |
| Jamie Lokier | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Dave Young | Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? |
git: | |
| Dan Miner | Compilation speeds (was Re: No patchlevel 3.} |
| Ian Jackson | RFD: comp.os.linux split |
| X X | X11 GIf viewer somewhere? |
| root | Broken pipe when using reboot/halt, etc. |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
