* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:heh. Evil plan to enable the group scheduler by default worked out as planned! ;-) [guess how many container users would do ... interactivity tests like you do??] 'very very nice' == 'best ever' ? :-) ok, i'm too seeing some sort of latency weirdness with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled, _if_ there's Xorg involved which runs under root uid on my box - and hence gets 50% of all CPU time. Srivatsa, any ideas? It could either be an accounting buglet (less likely, seems like the group scheduling bits stick to the 50% splitup nicely), or a preemption buglet. One potential preemption buglet would be for the group scheduler to not properly preempt a running task when a task from another uid is woken? Ingo -
| Jeff Garzik | [PATCH 1/9] irq-remove: core |
| Jamie Lokier | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Dave Young | Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? |
git: | |
| Dan Miner | Compilation speeds (was Re: No patchlevel 3.} |
| Ian Jackson | RFD: comp.os.linux split |
| X X | X11 GIf viewer somewhere? |
| root | Broken pipe when using reboot/halt, etc. |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
