* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:heh. Evil plan to enable the group scheduler by default worked out as planned! ;-) [guess how many container users would do ... interactivity tests like you do??] 'very very nice' == 'best ever' ? :-) ok, i'm too seeing some sort of latency weirdness with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled, _if_ there's Xorg involved which runs under root uid on my box - and hence gets 50% of all CPU time. Srivatsa, any ideas? It could either be an accounting buglet (less likely, seems like the group scheduling bits stick to the 50% splitup nicely), or a preemption buglet. One potential preemption buglet would be for the group scheduler to not properly preempt a running task when a task from another uid is woken? Ingo -
| James Bottomley | [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
