login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
25
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Subject:
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
Date: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 - 2:06 am
Chuck, On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 12:38 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
quoted text
> On 09/10/2007 03:44 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Yes, it has an hpet. And I tried every combination of options I could > >> think of. > > > >> But, even stranger, x86_64 works (only i386 fails.) > > > > x86-64 has quite different time code (at least until the dyntick patches > > currently in mm) > > > > Obvious thing would be to diff the boot messages and see if anything > > jumps out (e.g. in interrupt routing). > > > > Or check with mm and if x86-64 is broken there too then it's likely > > the new time code. > > I reported too soon that x86_64 works. It does not work, it just takes > a bit longer before it freezes. There are message threads all over the > place discussing this problem with the HP Pavilion tx 1000, and it seems > the best workaround is to use the "nolapic" option instead of "noapic". > Using that, it is totally stable _and_ there are no spurious interrupts > that would otherwise break USB. Interrupt setup is a bit strange, though:
can you please send me 32 and 64 bit boot logs of mainline and fedora kernels ? tglx -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Wed Sep 5, 4:30 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andi Kleen
, (Thu Sep 6, 4:31 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Fri Sep 7, 12:34 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Prakash Punnoor
, (Fri Sep 7, 10:17 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Mon Sep 10, 12:12 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andi Kleen
, (Mon Sep 10, 12:44 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Mon Sep 10, 4:33 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Sep 13, 9:38 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 15, 12:39 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Ingo Oeser
, (Sat Sep 15, 3:58 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 15, 4:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sat Sep 15, 5:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sat Sep 15, 11:42 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Dave Jones
, (Mon Sep 24, 2:32 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Tue Sep 25, 2:06 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Phillip Susi
, (Thu Sep 27, 3:03 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
swhiteho
[PATCH 42/51] [GFS2] Move inode deletion out of blocking_cb
FUJITA Tomonori
Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[git pull] Please pull powerpc.git merge branch
Ingo Molnar
Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] sched: automated per tty task groups
Vivek Goyal
Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups
git
:
Mike Miller
git message
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH] Detached HEAD (experimental)
Stefan Richter
Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
Jeff King
Re: [PATCH] t7004: test that "git-tag -u" implies "-s"
A Large Angry SCM
Re: [RFC] origin link for cherry-pick and revert
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
libata: disable ATAPI AN by default
Linux Kernel Mailing List
i915: Don't whine when pci_enable_msi() fails.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Documentation/timers/hpet_example.c: only build on X86
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ALSA: hda - Enable beep on Realtek codecs with PCI SSID override
Linux Kernel Mailing List
kbuild: move bounds.h to include/generated
linux-netdev
:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Re: [PATCH 06/37] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
David Miller
Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a seco...
Jeff Garzik
Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
David Miller
Re: [PATCH 2/5] dccp: Auto-load (when supported) CCID plugins for negotiation
Chuck Lever
Re: svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97).
openbsd-misc
:
Stuart Henderson
Re: Kuro5hin: OpenBSD Founder Theo deRaadt Has Conflict of Interest With AMD
Christian Weisgerber
Re: CARP with a single public IP address
Marco Peereboom
Re: OpenBSD culture?
"RALOVICH, Kristóf"
Re: thinkpad windows refund
Kevin
Re: uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries on 4.3 i386
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate