Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <joe@...>, <linux@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <vegard.nossum@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 - 3:50 am

>> Even the "kp_" prefix is actually pretty unnecessary.  It's "info"


Sorry for being unclear.  I wasn't seriously recommending no prefix,
due to name collisions (exactly your point), but rather saying that no
prefix is necessary for human understanding.

Something to avoid the ambiguity is still useful.  I was just saying
that it can be pretty much anything withouyt confusing the casual
reader.

We're in violent agreement, I just didn't say it very well the first
time.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API, Joe Perches, (Tue Sep 25, 2:54 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API, Vegard Nossum, (Tue Sep 25, 4:06 am)
Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API, , (Tue Sep 25, 3:50 am)