On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:06:42 -0700 Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:hm. I saw that warning on my 2-way. It has CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8 so perhaps the kernel has decided that this machine can possibly have eight CPUs. It's an old super-micro board, doesn't have ACPI. OEM ID: INTEL Product ID: 440BX APIC at: 0xFEE00000 Processor #0 6:8 APIC version 17 Processor #1 6:8 APIC version 17 I/O APIC #2 Version 17 at 0xFEC00000. Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs Processors: 2 ... Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 1707.03 BogoMIPS (lpj=3414067) Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 CPU: After generic identify, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 256K CPU: After all inits, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000040 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. Compat vDSO mapped to ffffe000. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. lockdep: not fixing up alternatives. CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 03 lockdep: not fixing up alternatives. Booting processor 1/1 eip 2000 Initializing CPU#1 Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 1704.02 BogoMIPS (lpj=3408054) CPU: After generic identify, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 256K CPU: After all inits, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000040 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1. CPU1: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 03 Total of 2 processors activated (3411.06 BogoMIPS). ExtINT not setup in hardware but reported by MP table ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs ..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=0 pin2=0 APIC timer registered as dummy, due to nmi_watchdog=1! checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]: passed. Brought up 2 CPUs One would think that the kernel would work out that eight CPUs ain't possible on such a machine. But we don't seem to print out any info which allows me to confirm that this is really what the kernel did. -
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview) |
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
git: | |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH RFC] [4/9] modpost: Fix format string warnings |
| Rick Jones | Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
