On (22/09/07 14:11), Satyam Sharma didst pronounce:
quoted text
> 
> > -static volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS];
> > +volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS];
> 
> That looks fishy to me. Why is it volatile-qualified?

It turned out that it was unnecessary. A follow-up patch removed the volatile
and kept the static.

quoted text
> And does that
> actually want to be a per-cpu var?
> 

-- 
-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/